UPDATE: Sadly, as with most things in her life, Carol's taken my meager parodic endeavor in the wrong way and it's prompted quite a response, laced with violent imagery, so typical from someone of her background, i.e. that of a supporter of murderers.
No, Carol. The pic wasn't meant to depict testicles, although it's awfully interesting that you became so fascinated by that aspect. Isn't it odd how a supposed feminist goes right to mutilation as a response method. Me wonders how Carol would react if some pathetic, raving sicko made a suggestion like hers, but about women? It's especially odd when you consider that Carol is one of those types who suggest that litigation is a recourse to any who might disagree with her wackiness, er, political views. Guess you blew that one, eh Carol? Didn't anyone ever explain to you at that law office that threats don't strengthen you position in a free speech case, especially when you've gone to such lengths to make yourself into a notable public figure? In fact, that usually closes that door for you.
What I'd been looking for was an image for a nutty old shrew and that's as close as I could get, Carol - a rodent with, well, maybe your therapist can explain the idea to you.
32 comments:
Carol's post(s) are deleted due to her threat and, dare I say, libel of an anonymous figure?
I figured she'd get herself banned from here, just not that it'd be that soon.
Anyway, wouldn't make much sense having the purported Carol Moore posting at The Fake Carol Moore Repor(t), now would it?
She did offer an rationale that would explain why libertarians are found to be at ease with racist sentiments. Seems she finds outright bigots to be honest. That would also explain the whole Ron Paul thing and the racism and homophobia that permeates libertarian thinking. No surprise that Carol might get the warm fuzzies for such types, given she's a known and admitted supporter of cop-killers and murderers.
Carol's obviously having a hard time getting her mind wrapped around, "You're banned from here, Carol."
Let me help you with that, Carol.
You don't get to post here. You won't get a debate because I don't join headcases in discussing their delusions.
Just for the imformation of those who are trying to follow this one-sided conversation (since I'll be deleting anything that the freak insists on posting), she's now claimed that I'm 1) John Odum, 2) JD Ryan & 3) Bernie Sanders!
I suppose if we wait long enough she'll claim I'm actually Julie Waters or Cathy Resmer posing as a man to confuse or mislead her into thinking... well, you get the idea. Carol has "issues."
Poof!!! Gone again, Carol.
Now she thinks I'm a Fed.
Poof!!! Get help, Carol.
Boing! Oh, and the blog stays, Carol. Begging just makes you look all the more pathetic.
Going, going...
More Moore tail-chasing (ewwww) and sunspot drivel (yawn).
Buh-bye.
Oh, dear!
Carol's now gone an exploded the myth of the "genteel revolution" and "peaceful disunion." Deviating from her earlier castration fantasy, it seems that those who won't submit and who might foster "dissension," will be cause for "violent civil wars." Apparently, if we all don't quietly drink the secession KoolAid here in Vermont, there's gonna be trouble.
Tell us, Carol, how'd that work out for your team the last time? And how, exactly, does that make you different from Bush/Cheney? (These are rhetorical questions so don't feel compelled to answer them. Really, don't.)
Finally, a couple of housekeeping matters. If you wanna communicate with JD, don't expect me to deliver your whacked out missives. And since you have grown bored with all this (thank you, thank you, thank you!), I'm not likely to get anymore of these increasingly bizarre rants of yours to delete. Too bad, though. You'll miss the additions that I have in the pipeline.
Post a Comment